Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print September 24, 2009
Psychosom Med 2009, doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181baef05
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bosch, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, K. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bosch, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, K. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrine
Right arrow Psychophysiology
Right arrow Stress and Coping
© 2009 by American Psychosomatic Society

Original Article


Received November 5, 2008
Returned for revision June 3, 2009

A General Enhancement of Autonomic and Cortisol Responses During Social Evaluative Threat

Jos A. Bosch , PhD, Eco J. C. de Geus , PhD, Douglas Carroll , PhD, Annebet D. Goedhart , MA, Leila A. Anane , MSc, Jet J. Veldhuizen van Zanten , PhD, Eva J. Helmerhorst , PhD, Kate M. Edwards , PhD


Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jos A. Bosch, PhD, E-mail: j.a.bosch{at}bham.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Objective: To examine the Social Self Preservation Theory, which predicts that stressors involving social evaluative threat (SET) characteristically activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The idea that distinct psychosocial factors may underlie specific patterns of neuroendocrine stress responses has been a topic of recurrent debate. Methods: Sixty-one healthy university students (n = 31 females) performed a challenging speech task in one of three conditions that aimed to impose increasing levels of SET: performing the task alone (no social evaluation), with one evaluating observer, or with four evaluating observers. Indices of sympathetic (preejection period) and parasympathetic (heart rate variability) cardiac drive were obtained by impedance- and electrocardiography. Salivary cortisol was used to index HPA activity. Questionnaires assessed affective responses. Results: Affective responses (shame/embarrassment, anxiety, negative affect, and self-esteem), cortisol, heart rate, sympathetic and parasympathetic activation all differentiated evaluative from nonevaluative task conditions (p < .001). The largest effect sizes were observed for cardiac autonomic responses. Physiological reactivity increased in parallel with increasing audience size (p < .001). An increase in cortisol was predicted by sympathetic activation during the task (p < .001), but not by affective responses. Conclusion: It would seem that SET determines the magnitude, rather than the pattern, of physiological activation. This potential to perturb broadly multiple physiological systems may help explain why social stress has been associated with a range of health outcomes. We propose a threshold-activation model as a physiological explanation for why engaging stressors, such as those involving social evaluation or uncontrollability, may seem to induce selectively cortisol release.

Key Words: social evaluation, autonomic reactivity, HPA-axis, response specificity, shame, self-esteem, psychological stress







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Psychosomatic Society