Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print July 16, 2007
Psychosom Med 2007, doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3180cabc85
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salmon, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dowrick, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salmon, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dowrick, C. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Consultation Psychiatry
Right arrow Health Psychology
Right arrow Somatoform
© 2007 by American Psychosomatic Society

Original Article


Received December 18, 2006
Returned for revision March 26, 2007

Primary Care Consultations About Medically Unexplained Symptoms: Patient Presentations and Doctor Responses That Influence the Probability of Somatic Intervention

Peter Salmon , DPhil, Gerry M. Humphris , PhD, Adele Ring , BSc, John C. Davies , PhD, Christopher F. Dowrick , MD


Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Peter Salmon, DPhil, E-mail: psalmon{at}liv.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Objective: In primary care, many consultations about physical symptoms that the doctor thinks are not explained by physical disease nevertheless lead to somatic interventions. Our objective was to test the predictions that somatic intervention becomes more likely a) when doctors provide simple reassurance rather than detailed symptom explanations and do not help patients discuss psychosocial problems and b) when patients try to engage doctors by extending their symptom presentation. Methods: Consultations of 420 patients presenting physical symptoms that the doctor considered unexplained by physical disease were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. Analysis modeled the probability of somatic intervention as a function of the quantity of specific types of speech by patients (symptomatic and psychosocial presentations) and doctors (normalization, physical explanations, psychosocial discussion). Results: Somatic intervention was associated with the duration of consultation. Controlling for duration, it was, as predicted, associated positively with symptom presentations and inversely with patients’ and doctors’ psychosocial talk. The relationship with doctors’ psychosocial talk was accounted for by patients’ psychosocial talk. Contrary to predictions, doctors’ normalization was inversely associated with somatic intervention and physical explanations had no effect. Conclusion: Somatic intervention did not result from the demands of patients. Instead, it became more likely as patients complained about their symptoms. Facilitating patients’ psychosocial talk has the potential to divert consultations about medically unexplained symptoms from somatic interventions. To understand why such consultations often lead to somatic interventions, we must understand why patients progressively extend their symptom presentations and why doctors, in turn, apparently respond to this by providing somatic intervention.

Key Words: somatization, communication, physician-patient relationships, symptoms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Hatcher and B. Arroll
Assessment and management of medically unexplained symptoms
BMJ, May 17, 2008; 336(7653): 1124 - 1128.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Psychosomatic Society