Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published online before print March 31, 2008, 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31816521f1
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cinel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cinel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Psychology
Psychosomatic Medicine 70:345-348 (2008)
© 2008 American Psychosomatic Society


RAPID COMMUNICATION

Exposure to Mobile Phone Electromagnetic Fields and Subjective Symptoms: A Double-Blind Study

Caterina Cinel, PhD, Riccardo Russo, PhD, Angela Boldini, PhD and Elaine Fox, PhD

From the Department of Psychology, University of Essex, United Kingdom (C.C., R.R., E.F.); and Department of Psychology, University of Valencia, Spain (A.B.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Caterina Cinel, Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom. E-mail: ccinel{at}essex.ac.uk

Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine whether acute exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (REFs) emitted by mobile phone may affect subjective symptoms.

Methods: Three large groups of volunteers (total 496) were exposed to REFs emitted by mobile phones in one session and sham signals in a different session. REF and sham exposure sessions were counterbalanced and double blinded. Participants were exposed to either Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) or unmodulated signals, and the mobile phone was positioned either on the left or on the right side of the head. Before and after REF and sham exposure participants completed a questionnaire to rate five symptoms. Any changes in the severity of the symptoms after REF exposure were compared with changes after sham exposure.

Results: For one group of participants (N = 160), it was found that dizziness was affected by GSM exposure, but this was not consistently found with the other two groups of participants. No other significant effects were found.

Conclusions: We did not find consistent evidence suggesting that exposure to mobile phone REFs affect subjective symptoms. Even though we acknowledge that more research is needed, we believe that our results give an important contribution to the research on mobile phone use and subjective symptoms.

Key Words: radio frequency electromagnetic fields • REF exposure • subjective symptoms • mobile phones

Abbreviations: REF = radio frequency electromagnetic field; GSM = Global System for Mobile Communication; CW = continuous wave; SAR = specific energy absorption rate; SD = standard deviation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Psychosomatic Society