Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rief, W.
Right arrow Articles by Rojas, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rief, W.
Right arrow Articles by Rojas, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Somatoform
Psychosomatic Medicine 69:864-869 (2007)
© 2007 American Psychosomatic Society


SOMATIC PRESENTATIONS: EPIDEMIOLOGY

Stability of Somatoform Symptoms—Implications for Classification

Winfried Rief, PhD and Graciela Rojas, Drmed

From the Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy (W.R.), Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; and the Department of Clinical Psychiatry (G.R.), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Winfried Rief, Clinical Psychology und Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Gutenbergstrasse18, D–35032 Marburg, Germany. E-mail: rief{at}staff.uni-marburg.de

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the stability of somatoform symptoms/disorders.

Methods: A literature search was done to select studies reporting data on stability of medically unexplained physical symptoms.

Results: Whereas individual symptoms vary over time, grouping symptoms into syndromes seems to create stable features. There are substantial problems with the use of lifetime diagnosis, favoring classification approaches that require only present state symptoms. Further, doctors’ ratings that symptoms are "medically unexplained" is highly problematic and reduces interrater reliability. Misdiagnoses and overlooking of organic conditions are in the same range as for other psychiatric (and many organic) disorders; therefore, this does not seem to reduce the stability of the diagnoses of somatoform disorders.

Conclusions: These results indicate how the classification of somatoform disorders can be improved. Some new diagnostic criteria are suggested that could be considered in the revision of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—V (DSM-V).

Key Words: somatoform disorder • classification • stability • reliability • misdiagnosis

Abbreviations: DSM = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; TR = Text Revision; ICD = International Classification of Disease; GP = general practitioner




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
T. olde Hartman, L. Hassink-Franke, C Dowrick, S Fortes, C Lam, H. van der Horst, P. Lucassen, and E. van Weel-Baumgarten
Medically unexplained symptoms in family medicine: defining a research agenda. Proceedings from WONCA 2007
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2008; 25(4): 266 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. L. Jackson and K. Kroenke
Prevalence, Impact, and Prognosis of Multisomatoform Disorder in Primary Care: A 5-Year Follow-up Study
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2008; 70(4): 430 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. E. Dimsdale, V. Patel, Y. Xin, and A. Kleinman
Somatic Presentations A Challenge for DSM-V
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2007; 69(9): 829 - 829.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Psychosomatic Society