Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karlamangla, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Seeman, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karlamangla, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Seeman, T. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Epidemiology
Right arrow Aging
Right arrow Blood Pressure
Psychosomatic Medicine 68:500-507 (2006)
© 2006 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Reduction in Allostatic Load in Older Adults Is Associated With Lower All-Cause Mortality Risk: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging

Arun S. Karlamangla, PhD, MD, Burton H. Singer, PhD and Teresa E. Seeman, PhD

From the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California (A.S.K., T.E.S.); Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey (B.H.S.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Arun S. Karlamangla or Teresa E. Seeman, 10945 Le Conte Avenue #2339, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1687. E-mail: akarlamangla{at}mednet.ucla.edu or tseeman{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Objectives: To study the association between change in allostatic load (a risk score constructed from multiple biological markers) over a 2.5-year period and mortality in the following 4.5 years in older adults.

Methods: We measured 10 physiologic parameters at baseline (1988) in a cohort of 171 high-functioning, community-dwelling, 70- to 79-year-old adults. These measurements were repeated 2.5 years later, in 1991. Summary allostatic load scores for 1988 and 1991 were created as the weighted sum of the 10 biological markers and their second-order terms. Mortality status (alive or dead) for participants was determined 4.5 years later, in 1995. The association between change in allostatic load score (1988–1991) and subsequent mortality (1991–1995) was studied using logistic regression.

Results: Compared with participants whose allostatic load score decreased between 1988 and 1991, individuals whose allostatic load score increased had higher risk of all-cause mortality between 1991 and 1995 (15% versus 5%, p = .047). Adjusted for age and baseline allostatic load, each unit increment in the allostatic load change score was associated with mortality odds ratio of 3.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.1–9.8).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that even in older ages, change in risk scores can be followed to improve assessment of mortality risk.

Key Words: risk score • mortality • allostatic load • risk factor change • risk score change

Abbreviations: DHEA-S = dehydroepiandosterone sulfate; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; CVD = cardiovascular disease; ROC = receiver operating curve.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
E. Bay, A. Sikorskii, and Fuli Gao
Functional Status, Chronic Stress, and Cortisol Response After Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Biol Res Nurs, January 1, 2009; 10(3): 213 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. W Lee, K. R Morton, J. Walters, D. L Bellinger, T. L Butler, C. Wilson, E. Walsh, C. G Ellison, M. M McKenzie, and G. E Fraser
Cohort Profile: The biopsychosocial religion and health study (BRHS)
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 3, 2008; (2008) dyn244v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. Maselko, L. Kubzansky, I. Kawachi, T. Seeman, and L. Berkman
Religious Service Attendance and Allostatic Load Among High-Functioning Elderly
Psychosom Med, June 1, 2007; 69(5): 464 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Psychosomatic Society