| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Psychosomatic Medicine 33:239-250 (1971)
© 1971 American Psychosomatic Society
1 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Psychosomatic and Clinical Pharmacology Sections Pittsburgh, Pa.; National Institute of Mental Health Research Scientist Awardee Type 2, No. 1-K2-MH-46.126-01.
2 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Psychosomatic and Clinical Pharmacology Sections Pittsburgh, Pa.
3 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Psychosomatic and Clinical Pharmacology Sections Pittsburgh, Pa.; Trainee in Clinical Pharmacology (HE 05467) from the National Heart and Lung Institute
Joseph D. Sapira, MD, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa 15213
A group of hypertensive patients (N = 19) and a control group of normotensive patients (N = 15) were shown two movies depicting two types of doctor-patient interaction. In the first movie, the doctor was rude and disinterested in the patient (the bad doctor). In the second movie, the doctor was relaxed and warm (the good doctor). After viewing the two movies, all patients were interviewed as to their impressions of the two scenes. During the viewing, blood pressure and pulse rate responses in the hypertensive group were small but significantly greater than those in the normotensive group; during the interview, the significantly greater response in the hypertensives was physiologically meaningful. The urinary catecholamine and cortisol excretion rates were no different between the 2 groups. Most striking was the finding that the hypertensive group tended to deny seeing any differences between the doctors depicted in the two movies, while the normotensive group could clearly identify differences in the behavior of the good doctor versus that of the bad doctor.
In a second experiment, the same movies were shown to a hypertensive group and to 3 normotensive groups. The patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire derived from auditing the tape recordings in the first experiment. This questionnaire made it possible to differentiate significantly between the hypertensive and normotensive groups. These data are compatible with the hypothesis that the hypertensive patient may perceptually screen out potentially noxious stimuli as a behavioral response to his hyperteactive pressor system.
Submitted on July 3, 1970
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. W. Younger, K. A. Lawler-Row, K. A. Moe, A. L. Kratz, and A. J. Keenum Effects of naltrexone on repressive coping and disclosure of emotional material: a test of the opioid-Peptide hypothesis of repression and hypertension. Psychosom Med, September 1, 2006; 68(5): 734 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Jennings Autoregulation of Blood Pressure and Thought: Preliminary Results of an Application of Brain Imaging to Psychosomatic Medicine Psychosom Med, May 1, 2003; 65(3): 384 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Scuteri, D. Parsons, M. A. Chesney, and D. E. Anderson Anger Inhibition Potentiates the Association of High End-Tidal CO2 With Blood Pressure in Women Psychosom Med, May 1, 2001; 63(3): 470 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. P. Heppner and C. J. Krauskopf An Information-Processing Approach to Personal Problem Solving The Counseling Psychologist, July 1, 1987; 15(3): 371 - 447. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. K. Ewart, K. F. Burnett, and C. B. Taylor Communication Behaviors That Affect Blood Pressure: An A-B-A-B Analysis of Marital Interaction Behav Modif, July 1, 1983; 7(3): 331 - 344. [Abstract]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
