Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MENZER, D.
Right arrow Articles by STURGIS, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MENZER, D.
Right arrow Articles by STURGIS, S. H.

Psychosomatic Medicine 19:379-388 (1957)
© 1957 American Psychosomatic Society

Patterns of Emotional Recovery from Hysterectomy

First in a Series of Reports

DORIS MENZER M.D.1, THOMAS MORRIS M.D.1, PHILLIP GATES M.D.1, JOSEPH SABBATH M.D.1, HARRIET ROBEY M.A., M.S.1, THOMAS PLAUT Ph.D.1, and SOMERS H. STURGIS M.D.1

1 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. and the Gynecologic Section of the Surgical Service, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital

Three types of clinical recovery of patients having undergone hysterectomy have been described. They were observed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and during convalescence in the hospital. Group A was characterized by a minimum of physical discomfort and subjectively experienced emotional suffering. Group B showed intensive and prolonged physical symptoms and emotional disturbances. Group AB showed physical and psychological distress intermediate between Groups A and B. The speed and nature of recovery from anesthesia bore little relationship to the extent of the procedures and technical difficulties of surgery, blood loss, or the depth, duration, and difficulties of anesthesia. The majority of cases contained in the pattern of recovery from anesthesia the blueprint of the important physiological and psychic facets of convalescence in the hospital. Women in Group A emerged into consciousness after the operation with a well-integrated ego. Their defenses, i.e., denial of loss, intellectualization, rationalization, and isolation of feeling, were sufficiently strong to expedite the process of recovery. This pattern was recapitulated in their subsequent hospital course.

Women in Group B were overwhelmed by the trauma of the operative experience. They reacted with regression, manifested by surrender to their impulses with primitive behavior or by passive withdrawal, becoming unresponsive and uncommunicative. They were unrealistic, uncooperative, and reacted to helping care, as well as to demands made on them, with an intensification of regressive behavior. This state lasted well into the period of convalescence and could only be modified by establishing an anaclitic relationship and by subsequent interpretative and ego strengthening psychotherapy. The outstanding features in Group B were the immature nature and intensity of the impulses and the inadequacy of the defense mechanisms.

In 3 cases the recovery from anesthesia was of Group B type but the convalescence in the hospital followed the pattern of Group AB. This was ascribed to successful psychotherapy which mitigated the intensity of the response to the hospital experience. It prepared them better for their subsequent convalescence. None of the patients in the study shifted in the opposite direction in their recovery, i.e., either from Group A to AB or from AB to B.

Women in Group AB showed regressive features of varying degrees, together with gradual strengthening of ego defenses and a general integrative capacity. The same pattern was observed in their subsequent recovery. There were greater variations in the strength and nature of ego defenses in this group than in the other two groups.

Submitted on November 13, 1956




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Holist NursHome page
V. Kinnick and D. Leners
The Hysterectomy Experience: An Ethnographic Study
J Holist Nurs, June 1, 1995; 13(2): 142 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1957 by the American Psychosomatic Society