Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PASQUARELLI, B.
Right arrow Articles by HORWITZ, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PASQUARELLI, B.
Right arrow Articles by HORWITZ, W.

Psychosomatic Medicine 18:143-149 (1956)
© 1956 American Psychosomatic Society

Further Appraisal of the Adrenalin-Mecholyl Test (Funkenstein Test)

BLAISE PASQUARELLI M.D.1, R. J. CAMPBELL M.D.1, PHILLIP POLATIN M.D.1, and WILLIAM HORWITZ M.D.1

1 Department of Clinical Psychiatry, The New York State Psychiatric Institute (Columbia University), New York, N. Y.

The Funkenstein adrenalin-Mecholyl test was administered to 46 hospitalized psychiatric patients. In 22 subsequent cases, only the Mecholyl was administered, since in our series this seemed the only meaningful portion of the test.

The Funkenstein test groups were correlated with clinical estimates of adequacy of affect and it was found that the groups with a hypotensive response to Mecholyl (Groups V-VI) had a significantly higher percentage (80 per cent) of adequate and appropriate affect than the hypertensive groups (Groups I-IV), only 48 per cent of which had adequate affect.

The Funkenstein test groups were also correlated with clinical outcome in our series, where the principal mode of treatment was psychotherapy; it was found that the hypotensive response groups (Groups V-VI) had a significantly higher improvement rate (78 per cent) than the hypertensive groups (48 per cent).

Finally, clinical outcome was correlated with clinically estimated affect without respect to the Funkenstein groups, and here it was found that improvement rate in patients with adequate affect was 74 per cent, whereas only 32 per cent of patients with inadequate affect showed improvement.

The positive correlation between adequacy of affect and clinical improvement was particularly marked in Groups I-IV, where 90 per cent of cases with adequate affect improved, whereas only 9 per cent of cases with inadequate affect showed improvement.

None of these findings is advanced as reliable indicators in long-term prognosis until outcome of follow-up studies can be assayed.

The psychophysiological significance and several conflicting explanations of the Mecholyl responses are discussed.

Submitted on December 15, 1954







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1956 by the American Psychosomatic Society